In the news

Los Angeles Times
Patrick McGreevy

Widespread complaints that state commissions operate in the dark and are cozy with businesses had California lawmakers on Wednesday wrestling with a flurry of bills aimed at shedding light on the panels to regain public trust.

More than a dozen pieces of legislation are pending that would change transparency procedures at the California Coastal Commission, the state Public Utilities Commission and the Board of Equalization.

“People naturally distrust government agencies and bureaucracies,” said Sen. Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo), author of six bills. “The Legislature has a responsibility to keep those agencies in check and responsible to the citizens. I think we are seeing the Legislature doing its job.”

An Assembly panel approved a measure on Wednesday that would prohibit private conversations between members of the Coastal Commission and those seeking to lobby them on an issue during the 24 -hour period before the matter will be discussed at a commission hearing.

The bill, which was authored by Assemblyman Mark Stone (D-Scotts Valley) and supported by 24 of his colleagues, would also require those who advocate for issues to a commission member to register as lobbyists and disclose who is paying them....

Read the whole article here:

Later Wednesday, a Senate panel advanced a bill authored by Hill that would prohibit any member of the state Board of Equalization from acting on a tax matter involving someone who has donated money to that member in the previous 12 months. The donations would also have to be disclosed.

The bill was introduced after the Los Angeles Times reported that companies were circumventing a $250 limit on contributions by funneling them through political action committees or by having employees give dozens of checks for $249 each to board members.

"All contributions should be subject to the disclosure and recusal requirement since the Board of Equalization is the only elected tax commission in the nation,” Hill told the state Senate Governance and Finance Committee before it OK'd the bill.

The measure is opposed by Board of Equalization member Jerome Horton, according to his staff attorney, Joss Tillard-Gates.

“It is our belief that restricting even small contributions of $1 to board members, although seemingly innocuous, is unnecessary and most notably a violation of the 1st Amendment right of freedom of expression without a legitimate public interest.”

But Emily Rusch, executive director of California Public Interest Research Group, said a ban is justified. “We think it will improve public trust in the Board of Equalization,” Rusch said.

Read the whole article here:

Support Us

Your donation supports CALPIRG’s work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.

Consumer Alerts

Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.
Optional Member Code

CALPIRG is part of The Public Interest Network, which operates and supports organizations committed to a shared vision of a better world and a strategic approach to getting things done.