Slick Politics: How the oil industry has spent millions to keep California dependent on oil
11/01/2006
Executive Summary
In 1996 and again in 2000, CALPIRG Education Fund completed studies of the levels of
money the oil industry spends on lobbying expenses and campaign contributions in
California state politics. With consumer and environmental activists continuing to be
frustrated in their attempts to enact meaningful petroleum diversity policies for California
despite record high gas prices and stubborn pollution problems, we decided to examine
once more the effects that money spent by the oil industry has on public policy.
In this report we examined the amount of money the oil industry has spent during the past
legislative session, how much money it has reported spending up to October 24, 2006 in
campaign contributions to political candidates and political parties since the last election,
and how its level of spending compares to other industries in the state.
We found that the major oil companies and oil industry associations spent $12,160,954
on lobbying expenses during the last legislative session, a sizable increase over their
expenses in the late 1990s. We also found that the oil companies and major oil executives
have given at least $5,275,957 in campaign contributions to California candidates and
political parties to date, excluding all of the money that has been poured into ballot
initiatives. Comparing the oil industry’s level of spending on campaign contributions
with the other largest industries in the state, the oil industry ranks third, with only real
estate and developer interests and television and movie production spending more.
We also examined the effects of the oil industry’s influence on public policy, particularly
with efforts to reduce our dependence on oil and develop alternative fuels and
transportation. California is highly dependent on oil to meet our energy needs, and our
dependence on oil continues to grow every year. Environmental impacts, high gasoline
prices, and increasing dependence on foreign sources of oil are three immediate reasons
why it is in California’s interest to adopt policies to reduce our dependence on oil. In
coming years, as worldwide oil demand outstrips supply, our overdependence on oil will
have profound detrimental impacts to California consumers and our economy.
Unfortunately, the oil industry’s influence in California politics continues to prevent our
state from adopting forward-thinking energy policies that prepare our state for a world
with less oil. One company alone, Chevron, reports lobbying on 106 bills in the state
legislature.
With the election just days away, and new elected officials to take office in January, this
report should be read not only as a look back on the last two years, but also a look
forward to future opportunities for California leaders to disregard oil industry money and
influence in politics and adopt smart policies to reduce our dependence on oil in 2007.
|
Read our news release.
Download the full report.
|